You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #60: utter abject nonsense [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
iverglas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #34
60. utter abject nonsense
and a big old straw person to boot:

I think teachers & students have the right to the freedom of expression,you can,t stop being a person of faith at the school door.

Second point first: no one suggested that anyone stop being anything at any school door. Teachers may BE anything they want; what they SAY in the classroom is a matter over which the public has say.

"Freedom of expression" does NOT mean that teachers may impose speech about something that has nothing to do with the curriculum they are hired to teach on a captive audience of students.

Teachers have the same right as anyone else to possess pornographic images and to use four-letter words in conversation: free speech, y'know. Does this mean that they must be permitted to exhibit pornographic images in the classroom, and use four-letter words in their lectures?

People have the right to be racists and misogynists and bigots. Does this mean that teachers must be permitted to call their students names?

STUDENTS have a right to an education in the public schools, and have the right not to be have their exercise of that right interfered with by anyone -- students, teachers, administrators, guests -- treating them differently on the basis of their personal characteristics.

Students who do not share this teacher's beliefs were being discriminated against by being forced to listen to his insulting and intimidating speech. And even if such a teacher would never have treated dissenting students differently when it came to assigning their marks, a student with any sense would be very much afraid that dissenting would result in a lower chance of success in the class. Both the immediate negative effect and the fear of further negative effects, depending on his/her response to the first problem, would plainly have a stifling effect on the student's ability to do what s/he is in the class to do: learn.

The teacher is free to say what he wants to anyone who wants to hear it. He is not "free" to violate the terms of the contract to which he has voluntarily become a party, which requires that he teach his students the curriculum he was hired to teach, not insult and harass them, without suffering the consequences: disciplinary action of whatever sort is provided for in that contract.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC