You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #3: Opposite extreme: retreat rule [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-12-07 03:31 PM
Response to Original message
3. Opposite extreme: retreat rule
In Ohio lethal force is only justified to protect against loss of life. One has a duty to retreat before resorting to lethal violence. This effectively means that the crime victim must prove to the jury that under the circumstances, he or she had no other choice. While there is generally no duty to retreat from ones home, the rule allowing lethal force to protect ones life only still applies. If someone is in the process of burning my house down, I cannot use lethal force to stop him if I can leave without risk of serious injury.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC