Reply #2: Disappointing: "more Warren Commission than Church Commission" [View All]

[DeepModem Mom]

"Led by co-chairmen who have attempted to steer the panel away from partisan debate, and relying on a staff assembled without direct involvement by the two major political parties, the commission's published statements so far have struck a centrist, judicious tone. In many respects, the panel's work has been closer to the fact-finding, conspiracy-debunking Warren Commission of the mid-1960s, which investigated the assassination of President John F. Kennedy, than to the reform-oriented Church Commission, which exposed assassination plots and CIA abuses during the mid-1970s."

From reading this lengthy article, it looks to me personally as if the Commission has sought, in the name of "bipartisanship," to blame Clinton as much as Bush, and, additionally, to absolve the Saudis. There is no bipartisanship with the Bush cabal; they're far outside the parameters of partisanship. The people need the TRUTH about these people, and about 9/11, and it doesn't look to me as if this panel has even tried to give us, and the 9/11 families, the truth.