You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #15: Sickening Absence [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
Bennet Kelley Donating Member (102 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-22-06 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. Sickening Absence
I think we agree that whether or not fraud occurred in the past election falls into the category of what Donald Rumsfeld would call "unknown unknowns" -- although we can also agree that it remains a possibility.

Where we disagree is that you presume fraud absent any evidence, while I take the opposite approach. I believe claiming fraud absent any proof is irresponsible and only damages our credibility. There are plenty of compelling facts to support the cause, so I see no reason to invent others that cannot be substantiated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC