Reply #95: For me, it's not even a problem that its embarassing [View All]

[Must_B_Free]

I am OK with having "whacked out CT crap" on a blog or message board. if that's what you want to call it. TO me I see it as wonderings. I don't even make statements as intentional statements of fact. To me it's all supposition. No one every said that blogs were fact machines.

What concerned me was the couching of the topic of blog discussion on Bo Dietl. What I heard specifically were "Bloggers Play Detective" and "You can't believe anything you read on the internet". So I see this as, either knowingly or unknowingly, contributing to a calculated smear on any information not made "official" by main stream media channels.

To me, it looks like the corporatists have calculated a defensive smear. Consider that this is being drudged up suddenly after it had disappeared for several weeks.

I am curious as to how we ended up contributing to a smear that ultimatley undermines us all, especially when, in my recollection, the high school photos pretty much closed the case on whether this is Gosch.

In my recollection, the suppositions on how Gannon could possibly be Gosch, after the high school photos emerged, ranged from theories involving aliens to theories involving cloning. If someone wants to challenge the photos and come up with a new idea of how Gannon could be Gosch - I am open to hearing it.

Clearly Andy still thinks that Gannon could be Gosh and I am curious to hear how he has rationalized the Conneaut Lake yearbook photos, to the extent that he was willing to go on national TV and push the Gosch angle.

I can only guess that it is based on his friendship with Noreen Gosch. And perhaps things he has discussed with her that we haven't heard, but, he can explain his position himself, if he feels like it.