You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #8: No, they're evidence, just not included in the report... [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
parasim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-04 05:12 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. No, they're evidence, just not included in the report...
... apparently they made them jump though a few hoops to actually see that evidence.

But what bugs me is, any self-respecting investigative reporter would have certainly jumped through those hoops. And perhaps some reporters did, but their editors stifled them?

But certainly all the Bushoids would have seen the pictures. The descriptions alone would be enough to prompt them to take a look-see, I would imagine. Wouldn't they?

I totally agree with the idea of firing up the ol' RICO ACT...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC