You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Two party systems unavoidable? [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
George_Bonanza Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-30-04 08:49 PM
Original message
Two party systems unavoidable?
Advertisements [?]
It seems that in most countries, it all dwindles down to basically two parties: a general liberal one and a general conservative one. Then there are perennial outsiders who are too exclusionist to appeal to the broad spectrum of voters. Take Canada for example. On Jay Leno last night, Michael Moore erroneously said that Canada has five major parties. Living in Canada, I know that Canada is more like a single party state. With a small population, a good amount of it concentrated in educated and cosmopolitan cities, and no Deep South to impede our progress, Canadians are generally liberal. The 20th century has been dominated by Liberals, them having ruled for about 75% of the time. A couple of aberrations of Progressive Conservatives like John Diefenbaker and Brian Mulroney have broken the streak. Yet now, thanks mostly to the disasterous governments of Mulroney and Campbell, the PCs have died and have been forced to merge with the socially regressive Reform/Canadian Alliance party to simply put a right-wing resistance to the Liberal juggernaught. Meanwhile, the NDP are simply seen as too antagonistic, too unwieldy, and too unable to form a federal government. Fiascos on the federal level, like in BC, do not help the party standing. Even with a hot and media savvy leader like Jack Layton, the NDP only got 21 seats, nowhere near their zenith during the Broadbent years (when they reached the high forties). At best, the NDP are seen as watchdogs to the inevitable Liberal government. The Bloc Quebecois are a regional party and probably should not be allowed in federal debates if the Green Party is excluded.

What I'm trying to say is that in a lot of multi-party countries like in Canada or Western Europe, it still boils down to two parties, with a couple of peripheral parties that only serve as watchdogs. In Britain, the Labour Party is virtually unchallenged, so much so that even with Blair's unpopularity, there is no challenger. In Canada, the right-wing is too fractured between progressive conservatives and conservative conservatives to present a viable threat to Liberal rule.

While the U.S. political system is far from perfect (the EC should be scrapped forever), is it that different from others?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC