You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #21: Is that so? [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
Columbia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-04 10:40 PM
Response to Reply #15
21. Is that so?
Healthcare was readily available to ALL Iraqis under the Saddam regime and even pointed to internationally as a model for other countries...UNTIL Desert Storm and the sanctions imposed by the US-led UN action. These sanctions imposed a heavy toll on the healthcare system of Iraq as well as the education system.

Yup, Saddam was so strapped for cash that he had to beg other countries to take oil vouchers worth billions for political favors.
Then he had to shift priorities from funding healthcare to building dozens of palaces and funnel away more billions to his private coffers for the public good.

Under Saddam, the Iraqis held the distinction of being the most literate country in the ME (even including Israel) and among the top in the world. The Iraqi women were well educated and visible participants in the government (wheter you like the government or not).

Like I said, how else are you going to indoctrinate the youth if they can't read the state-approved propaganda/schoolbooks praising Papa Saddam and how he heroically defeated the Persians and the United States in the great wars?

Iraq was not the only country have "dissidents" disappear, including the US. All across South America thousands of dissidents were killed by US-backed dictatorships. Our hands are as dirty as Saddams'.

Ah, the old "But Johnny was bad too, so why can't I be bad?" Sorry, Sara, that doesn't work for right-wingers justifying war-crimes against the Iraqis and it won't work for Saddam apologists justifying his human right violations.

Iraq was a secular state but religion was practiced freely, it just was not supported by the state. It was probably more religiously free under Saddam than the US is now under the RW-taliban

Ah, yes, they were so much more free when Saddam barred the Shia from making a pilgrimage to Karbala for 25 years and openly practicing devotion to their Prophet Hussein (no relation). Let me know the next time you get arrested going to Easter Mass, kay?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC