You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #15: yes and no.... [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
Lexingtonian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-10-05 02:48 AM
Response to Original message
15. yes and no....

I'm not sure who/what exactly you mean with 'triangulating', but the Democrats I think you are arguing with don't necessarily disagree with gay marriage. They disagree with aggressive emphases on it at this political moment.

They have a point. In fact, I think a sort of poetic/imaginative look at what the GOP is doing nationally, now that it has unobstructed power and no Democratic/liberal distraction, is redebating the issues of white American history within itself. In a sense, there's nothing else they share as knowledge, such as it is, or common inheritance- what else could they possibly be rearguing.

Right now we've done the New Start (Bush's Inauguration vulgarity and Republican full majorities celebrating themselves gleefully and vainly) and quickly got to indentured servitude (1620s) in February as the Bankrupcy Bill. We've done Conquest/Rape/Cultivation of the Wilderness as the ANWR argument, the refusal to clean up the BIA mess, and the reduction of farm subsidies and Medicare. We're into the battles of Puritanism at this point- the Mary Dyer life/death issues (1657-60) curiously contorted as the Schiavo argument, the argument about theocratic judges and rule (1663-1720s) as the 'nuclear option', the Salem Witch trial and its (too late for some victims) reversal (1692, 1693) in the East Waynesville Baptist Church business. At the present clip of roughly 1 year of American history per day, this argument will last another month or two and the present RR Neopuritanism be defeated for all practical purposes...for all time.

Even if this fun theory is wrong, empirically the Republican argument among themselves is all about theocracy and its role. Some Democrats have caught on to the overall picture- the status of the Religious Right leadership's agenda getting destroyed within the GOP- and realized that the worst possible thing to do at the moment is to give them some Democratic opposition to rally against.

So I see the Democratic response as some combination of uninformed and wise 'don't interrupt your enemy while he's handing you the victory you want'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC