Reply #4: There's divided opinions there. Some totally trust the WH vetting [View All]

[napi21]

process, and some are very skeptical.

Here's a snip from one post that I thought pretty funny.

"And Souter was "good enough" for Bush senior; Kennedy was "good enough" for Reagan.
I'm inclined to agree with Coulter that "good enough" doesn't cut it, not when we control the Senate and have a VP tie-vote breaker.

We ought to be going for "demonstrably and clearly proven" not merely "good enough, even if that means a one-vote squeaker win. The last thing we need is an apparent conservative who is ready to jettison his conservatism to advance emotion-based judical legislating on behalf his favorite oppressed ersatz victim group."