You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #36: Good for him [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
whatever4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-24-05 07:11 AM
Response to Reply #28
36. Good for him
And shame on them. In England, they USE their subways for shelters for the homeless. Here, we boot them out.

Sick friggin nation we live in. Rather inconvenient persons just crawl off and die. Funny how many folks don't realize they'd be just as inconvenient in his place. Funny how many don't have a concept of public property.

I caught a spot on tv the other day, and I can't honestly remember the channel, but it was basically scenes of public property like parks and libraries and buildings, and for each scene, the caption was...what was it...something like "This is yours". Or no, it I think it was "This belongs to you" It was a great statement, slowly, one picture after another, and the words "This belongs to you". Moving, and in this day and age, it even gave me a little wake up. As far as what I now feel about my nation and my life. What am I entitled to?

At this point, I'm entitled to crawl away and die. No one will even notice until things are well and truly ruined for good. We're conditioning ourselves not to care. To blame the less able. They drain the rest of "us".

Know what's, to me, the most ironic and stupid? Our homeless, they're sorta like our smokers. Smokers have to smoke outside now. We stand there, outside, somewhere in the vicinity of the door, or wherever the designated area is. So, we're the one's outside looking around. Keeping watch. Almost the door guard. Anyone tried to do something, we'd be right there. The smokers. That's us, always standing around, watching. I think we're right handy people to have, I mean, we're right THERE at the door. And don't you think, in a situation, a terrorist situation, we'd be ALL over it? Oh yeah buddy we would, and having worked in federal buildings, don't think it hasn't come to mind a time or two. For non-smokers, I'm here to tell you it's been a topic of conversation. We're RIGHT there, at the door frequently, and any nutcase trying to come in would likely have to go through quite a few of us. And trust me we're up to the fight; we're an ornery sort anyway, us smokers.

Anyway, long-winded rant, I view the homeless in something of the same light, and I think law enforcement should too. Homeless folks...they hang around. That's what they do. You get used to them, you know who they are and where they live...so they aren't exactly strangers.

So when I read about watching them for being spies, I thought hell that's just the opposite of what it should be. These people are on the ground, right there watching, without a lot else to do. And many cops know these folks anyway, it's part of the job, right? So why not depend on them a little, appreciate their eyes, harness their attention. They can be seen as trusted individuals, I mean their lives are an open book, living homeless, and if anyone would notice something odd going on, they would. They're right there on the street, in the alleys, eyes everywhere.

Wouldn't it be better than shoving them aside...for some OTHER group to use...as the admin fears? I swear, they explain to us a danger, and then they go about making it happen. Like terrorism and the Iraq war. Made it happen. Shove aside the homeless and then target them as terrorists...because they're uniformly malcontents, because they've been shoved aside. Self-fulfilling prophesy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC