You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #27: Arguable? [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
Hep Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 11:36 AM
Response to Reply #26
27. Arguable?
It's arguable how accurately they represent Dean.

No it isn't. It's only arguable if you subscribe to the notion that one can take decade old comments out of context and use them to counter current policies.

Bottom line, your man has nothing on Dean. He is having unions plucked out from under him. He can't address Dean's message, so he goes back and digs up irrelevant dirt from the early nineties in an attempt to SCARE d's away from him.

Gep thinks we're all stupid enough to fall for it, or, instead of confederate flag waving votes, he just wants the dimwit votes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC