You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #35: It is unlikely he would do so since the truth is always a defense [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
nothingshocksmeanymore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 07:09 PM
Response to Reply #30
35. It is unlikely he would do so since the truth is always a defense
Edited on Thu Nov-06-03 07:11 PM by nothingshocksmeanymo
in which case it really doesn't matter how long ago the incidents were. It is, however, a matter the state CAN investigate and depending on the behavior of his "so-called" respected investigation firm, there are matter concerning obstruction of justice on which he might be treading including intimidation of witnesses.

Ah to ever see you defend a Democrat in quite the same way you seem to defend Republicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC