Reply #74: It's all about being "correct" to you, isnt it, Novak? [View All]

[Scott Lee]

But with an argument like "If all the Democrats had voted for Nader we Bush wouldn't be in office", you will get laughed off whatever platform you stand on when you say it....

Why? Are you proposing that a combined Green/Dem vote in 2000 would NOT have kept Bush from the White House? Please explain that fuzzy math.

Once again my point is proven correct "Some people just WON'T learn"...

It sounds like you're more interested in being "correct" than getting Bush out of office. I know alot of Freepers with that argumentative construct.

fact: GREEN PARTY CANDIDATES will NEVER be voted into the White House because you represent too few people so your argument is spectacularly wrong...but you already knew that...and yet you defend it....which brings me back once again:

Here are some other facts.

Are you aware that many libertarians voted for Bush?

Is the Libertarian Party as large and powerful as the Republicans or Democrats? (hint: It's not)

Can you not see then, that being a fringe party but voting for a major party's candidate that wins office, you in essence get "into" the White House as well?

"Some people just WON'T learn"

True...as that look into a mirror will reveal.