You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #48: I don't read the Inquirer but I don't think it's that simple. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
tlb Donating Member (611 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-03 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
48. I don't read the Inquirer but I don't think it's that simple.
My understanding is Rush was never caught with controlled substances. Moreover the local prosecutor said in a news story that the maid's tape recordings of Rush were inadmissible in Fla courts. He has admitted a drug problem but as far as I know, has not admitted a specific crime.

Whatever the truth and reality of his situation, that may very well not permit a prosecution. Sometimes the law "is a ass", sometimes not. A bad result in one case should have no carryover to a proper case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC