You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Kucinich endorses voter verified paper trail on campaign website [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-22-03 09:22 PM
Original message
Kucinich endorses voter verified paper trail on campaign website
Advertisements [?]
Edited on Sat Nov-22-03 09:29 PM by Eric J in MN
Kucinich endorses voter verified paper trail on campaign website.

Do any of the other candidates?

From
http://www.kucinich.us/issues/e_voting.php
--------------------------------------------

As Rep. Rush Holt stated, "We cannot afford nor can we permit another major assault on the integrity of the American electoral process. Imagine it's Election Day 2004. You enter your local polling place and go to cast your vote on the brand new "touch screen" voting machine. The screen says your vote has been counted. As you exit the voting booth, however, you begin to wonder. How do I know if the machine actually recorded my vote? The fact is, you don't".

This is why I am strong supporter and co-sponsor of Rep. Holt's bill H.R. 2239, otherwise known as the "Voter Confidence and Increased Accountability Act of 2003". If instated, this bill would:

* Require all voting machines to produce a voter-verified paper record for use in manual audits and recounts
* Ban the use of undisclosed software and wireless communications devices in voting systems
* Require all voting systems to meet these requirements in time for the general election in November 2004
* Require that electronic voting systems be provided for persons with disabilities by January 1, 2006
* Require mandatory surprise recounts in 0.5% of domestic jurisdictions and 0.5% of overseas jurisdictions

We have already seen the consequences of inaccurate vote keeping in Florida during the 2000 Presidential Elections where over 280,000 ballots were uncounted, leaving the sum of disenfranchised Floridians far greater than the 537-vote margin by which the state was won. Thousands of nationally and internationally-renowned computer scientists consider a voter-verified paper trial to be a critical safeguard for the accuracy, integrity, and security of computer-assisted elections. Many of them can also list dozens of plausible ways for computerized voting machines to be compromised.

While there is certainly room for improvement in voting technology, electronic voting machines are not the answer. I believe that election reform is an issue that deserves close attention, but we must also guard against changes that inadvertently create even worse problems. Unless we are using auditable voting equipment, public confidence in our elections will be eroded and the results of any election will remain open to question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC