You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #39: That isn't as much of a threat as you think [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
knight_of_the_star Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-03 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #6
39. That isn't as much of a threat as you think
For one, most of the Army and the Marine Corps is either insufficient in numbers to keep a lid on the populace solidly. That and considering that they swear their loyalty to the Constitution, I think that they fight turn their guns on the government rather than the people.

For two, while yes law enforcement would be mobilized to enforce martial law, there simply aren't enough cops to do the job. Just think about how bad the crime situation is in palces like New York, LA, and Chicago RIGHT NOW. Now think of how many cops will be left standing if the people of those cities revolt considering how strained they are just to keep the murder rate down. That is assuming that the police will even go along with it.

For three, there are enough people with enough guns that tech won't matter that much in comparison. Numbers to tell, and even if only say, half, of the population rises up, you still have 120 million to 1 million, maybe two or three of there are that many cops. Numbers do tell in battle, and here there won't BE any stable battle lines, leaving supply dumps and the like wide open for ambush. The last time our military fought in such circumstances was in Vietnam, and they didn't do so hot then. If enough people rose up, then the Army would either join them, refuse to fight, or get overwhelmed. That and there are a LOT of veterans who are NOT in the armed forces who would probably jump onbaord who have the training and such.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC