You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #102: Interesting response, but typical of "Lone Nut" theorists... [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
Media_Lies_Daily Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-03 11:54 PM
Response to Reply #97
102. Interesting response, but typical of "Lone Nut" theorists...
Your attitude is similar to the attitude of 95% of the "Lone Nut" theorists that I've encountered during my 40 years of research on the JFK assassination. Invaribly, you people tend to be rude, abusive, abrasive, obnoxious, and not above lying when it suits your purposes. You have definitely proven today that you're a proud member of that 95%.

The article I linked systematically refutes the so-called "jet-effect" theory. It is definitely on the net, although, as you stated, it has gone over the limit on hits. Tony Szamboti's study definitely rebutted the so-called "jet-effect" theory because he proved mathematically that Alverez was "blowing smoke". His work is also linked to quite a few of the more reutable JFK Assasination websites.

If you really believe that you're correct on this issue, give it until tomorrow when the hit-load lessens and you get the opportunity to read his analysis. I also want to copy the article so that I can use it to refute that "jet-effect" nonsense as many times as needed.

As far as the doctors are concerned, here's what you stated verbatim in your post:

"...both of which are perfectly consistent with the autopsy finding an entrance wound at the rear part of the skull and an exit wound towards the front (which the four principle ER doctors from Parkland agreed with)..."

Please tell me if I incorrectly copied and pasted your comments to this post.

And here is how I reponded:

"Please tell me the names of the four doctors at Parkland that you claim found an entrance wound at the rear part of the skull and an exit wound towards the front. Then tell me where I might find that sworn testimony."

Now, tell me exactly how I "misrepresented" your comments. Anyone who makes the bold claim like the one referenced above should have tons of material ready to use as references to back up their claims.
So, when are you going to tell me the names of the four doctors who you allege made the claims you referenced in your post and where I might find that testimony?

By the way, did you know that Parkland was a trauma center that treated tons of people with gunshot wounds, and that all of the Parkland doctors had excellent hands-on experience in identifying and treating exit and entrance wounds?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC