Reply #12: Oh, I guess you're too busy to read what I wrote... [View All]

[William Seger]

... or click on that link that has an astonishingly thorough investigation of what's shown on the Zapruder film. Let me post that link for you again: http://karws.gso.uri.edu/JFK/Scientific_topics/Physics_of_head_shot/Physics_of_the_head_shot.html

"Massive head wound. Just look at the sketch. It was an EXIT wound. They all said it was. Give it up. How do you explain the picture. How did they retrieve the back of his head?" So, I wasted a lot of time (on you, anyway) explaining the very things that your still asking about? You might at least throw in a phrase or two that indicated that you actually read what I wrote.

"I am just an ordinary citizen who has no agenda but to learn the truth." Well, you fooled me. For example, it's a truth that the Zapruder film shows JFK's head snapping forward when he was shot, and you seem to be highly allergic to that truth because it spoils your unsubstantiated shot-from-the-front hypothesis.

"I would like your answers to the following:
Do you believe the government always tells the truth?"

Of course not! But your "logic" seems to be that the government always lies, so we can ignore the facts.

"Do you believe that political assassinations never occurred in the U.S.?"

Every murder of a head of state that I'm aware of was a "political" assassination, so what's your point?

"Do you believe that there has ever been a government coverup?"

More "logic"...

"If you agree that there has been a coverup, is that by definition a conspiracy?"

Well, no, a "conspiracy" would mean involvement in the planning or the execution. But in fact, I really do think the WC intentionally avoided investigating what the CIA was doing back then. They really were involved in assassination conspiracies, for example.

All I'm saying here is that I believe, with about 99.9% confidence, that Oswald killed JFK with two shots from the TSBD, and there doesn't seem to be any "credible" evidence that anyone else was involved. Show me some "credible" evidence and I'll change my mind -- again.