You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #10: It's not an "arbitrary rule" [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
PermanentRevolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-12-06 12:54 AM
Response to Reply #2
10. It's not an "arbitrary rule"
A signature is required on the ballot envelope so that election workers can confirm that the voter is registered in the county the vote will be counted in. There's no personal information on the ballot itself, so that your vote remains anonymous in a manual recount. The information on the envelope is the only way to determine if the absentee voter is registered and eligible to vote. Personally, I don't see the problem with that. Otherwise, what's to stop someone from voting multiple times using anonymous absentee ballots?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC