You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #14: Income taxes keep people out of jobs [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Economy Donate to DU
dcfirefighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-26-05 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Income taxes keep people out of jobs
Though I do support a progressive income tax over a flat consumption tax.

The Fairtax addresses the necessity / luxury argument fairly well, I think. It does this by not being flat. Rather than exempting food & clothing, which would also exempt luxury food and luxury clothing or trying to determine where the dividing lines laid, which would open itself up to lobbying, it taxes all of them. However, it determines the effect of it's tax on a family spending at the poverty level, and gives each family that amount of money back as a rebate each month (i.e. all families of four receive ~$600 dollars each month)

Writing off portions of your taxes only allows people to spend their post- payroll tax but pre-income tax paycheck on charitable causes. The fairtax would allow people to spend their complete paycheck on charitable causes, without paying an income tax or a payroll tax. Likewise, determining what is and what isn't deductible leaves lots of room for special (i.e. undemocratic) interest lobbying.

I don't really have any problem with taxing incomes over ~$250,000 - these incomes aren't typically earned by merit, risk, or hard work, but rather by manipulation of the legal / economic system.

Problems with a progressive income tax:
Any tax that falls on income from the wages and salaries of the majority of workers rasises the cost of employment. For example, I take home $35,000 a year, this is what I'm willing to work for. However, it costs my employer $50,000 a year to employ me. Therefore, I must bring more than $50,000 worth of productivity to my employer in order to receive my $35,000. The demand for labor is elastic, removing the 'tax' wedge from income taxes (payroll taxes are much worse) would increase employment. Increased employment would require employers to pay higher wages in order to attract talented employees.

My salary is $50,000, which doesn't get me much in Washington, DC. I pay 15.8% of my salary as a federal income tax. Someone doing a similar job in a less expensive area might make $35,000 a year, and pay only 11.9% of his salary. Progressive income taxes place an undue burdon on people working in high cost of living areas - usually 'blue' areas on the coasts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Economy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC