You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #25: The difference is that that was from thr NRC Incident reports [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
seventhson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-22-04 06:34 PM
Response to Reply #22
25. The difference is that that was from thr NRC Incident reports
and so it was serious enough to merit reporting. My pooint is that the company you cite does nuclear and homeland security contracting for the govcernment and OF COURSE they are going to produce and.or distribute repoorts that say what they do is safe.

It is like asking Cheney if Halliburton cheats on its contracts.

It is unreliable as a source because of a conflict of interest.

The anti-nuke folks do not have billions of dollars of profits at risk like the proponents of nukes do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC