You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is the Mass Exodus About to Begin - Maybe So [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
bananas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 08:49 AM
Original message
Is the Mass Exodus About to Begin - Maybe So
Advertisements [?]
From the Professional Reactor Operator Society website,
please read the comments there:

http://www.nucpros.com/?q=node/3927

Is the Mass Exodus About to Begin - Maybe So

by Bob Meyer

Some things just have a percipitous effect, and the exodus from the nuclear industry may be one of those things that are at our door step now. For example, one training manager turned in the retirement paperwork when it was found out that the company would not buy back vacation. The next person in line sees the writing on the wall, longer hours, short staffed, mmm... another person turns in the retirement paperwork. The bad thing is that an INPO ATV is not long away. Often successful people will not stick around to be put in an unsuccessful situation. Many individuals are stating, "one bad day to retirement." I hear 455 days, 233 days as greetings in the hallway, many times it includes hours and minutes to retirement. That has become a common greating. It is sad, and it is distracting to the new hires. How can we change the workforce views, how can we change companies compassion for the most valuable asset they have, the workforce.

Many companies have sustained budget savings by not filling jobs right away. Not a good thing in todays market. This puts additional stress on the rest of the workforce, in turn, more early retirements. We can no longer wait to fill a position once it is open, and then take 6 months to do it. We have to fill it before the position is vacant to ensure a good turnover. This puts the workforce under stress. We, as an industry can do better than that.

Many sites are in a critical condition. The fatigue rule coming in about 18 to 20 months from now will limit overtime and hopefully force the workforce to staff for the jobs that need to be done. This might even make it easier for the aging workforce to keep at it just a little longer. The staffing decision made today will be directly impacting the bottom line and the stockholders tomorrow.

I have often asked other sites where they are going to get their people. Too often I hear, "We are going to steal them from you." Take a look how many people are moving from company to company today.

<snip - read the comments ... >

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC