You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #129: In 1965 [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU
one-eyed fat man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-11 02:37 AM
Response to Reply #46
129. In 1965
Edited on Sun Jan-16-11 02:52 AM by one-eyed fat man
There was no Federal license needed to sell guns.

You could buy guns at Sears, Woolworth's, Western Auto, and most any hardware store. You could buy guns mail order. Klein's
in Chicago and Bannermann's in New York had big catalogs. There were no waiting periods. No background checks. You could buy government surplus guns direct from the US Army through the Director of Civilian Marksmanship.

Sen. Thomas Dodd, a Connecticut Democrat, was in the Senate trying, again, to get gun control, particularly a ban on handguns, passed. The term, "Saturday Night Special" was coined to refer to small imported or inexpensive handguns, a cynical ploy on the term, "Niggertown Saturday Night"

He gained some small notoriety when a Colt's Pocket Model fell from his pocket on the floor of the Senate. While he suffered some derision as a hypocrite for having a gun, nothing was said about obvious fact that he was in habit of carrying it pocket, concealed.

Upper class whites were not much affected by concealed carry laws, even in Washington, DC in 1965.

There are other examples of remarkable honesty from the state supreme courts on this subject, of which the finest is probably Florida Supreme Court Justice Buford's concurring opinion in Watson v. Stone (1941), in which a conviction for carrying a handgun without a permit was overturned, because the handgun was in the glove compartment of a car:

"I know something of the history of this legislation. The original Act of 1893 was passed when there was a great influx of negro laborers in this State drawn here for the purpose of working in turpentine and lumber camps. The same condition existed when the Act was amended in 1901 and the Act was passed for the purpose of disarming the negro laborers and to thereby reduce the unlawful homicides that were prevalent in turpentine and saw-mill camps and to give the white citizens in sparsely settled areas a better feeling of security. The statute was never intended to be applied to the white population and in practice has never been so applied. (emphasis added)




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC