Reply #153: "..taking over countries.." - Isn't that the pot calling the kettle black? [View All]

[kayecy]

....actually we all know what happened in 48..dont we.....an attempt to remove the jews. Most likly it would have been the arabs who didnt accept a single state with the jews...

The 1948 civil war was a result of the UN partition proposal.... I repeat my question, if the Brits had insisted on universal suffrage any time before the Peel Commission partition proposal (1937), would the Zionists have agreed to it? The answer is no, no, never....The Zionist were not fools, they wanted a Jewish majority area, as large as possible and cared not a fig what happened to the local residents.

....the Palestenains had the PLO...a quasi govt before the PA......samething

Same thing, I agree but not relevant..... All my statements on the morality of Zionism have referred to the pre-1937 period..... The PLO was formed by the Arab League in June, 1964....Prior to that date you can only talk of groups of Palestinians...Tell me which group you are referring to and I may agree with you..... Individual groups of Zionist immigrants were like Palestinian groups, some criminal, some innocent. The responsibility of the Zionist organizations which planned the break-up of Palestine, is a totally different matter.

.....and then you write "whatever wrongs"..am i to assume that killing people in cold blood, taking over countries....

Killing in cold blood is a crime....If you can refer to me a document which shows Jews have killed less Palestinians than Palestinians have killed Jews I would like to see it....As for "...taking over countries.." - Isn't that the pot calling the kettle black?