Reply #59: I doubt very much.... [View All]

[zforce]

that CT'ers would argue with you that there was no steel anywhere in the building reaching temps above 250c...(ie..the motlen steel).

Though, I am sure you meant that CT'ers hold the position that the fires which had been caused by the impact of the plane were not hot enough for a long enough period to cause steel temps in the fire/impact area to reach temps above 250c, as is/was attested by the steel samples(minus the three "maybe's" above 250c) which were once held to be representative by the NIST(that is, before the results).


Now, regarding your World's Best Institution's well respected computer models of, "less severe", "base", or "more severe"....

Why not, "less than less severe", or "less than less than less severe"?

Would it at least be possible?

"NIST"

"Of course it wouldn't be possible, since obviously the steel temps must have reached weakening temps, after all we all did see a fire and then three buildings collapse".

Junk Science my friend, garbage scientifically input,then garbage scientifically outputted.