Reply #78: The video image shows a single frame of half of SOMETHING. [View All]

[MercutioATC]

...and it's blurry.

Call it an F-16 if you'd like. Say it fired a missile. The problem is that you're applying the scientific method backwards, which necessitates that you ignore other evidence to support your theory. You're starting with the assumption that a 757 didn't crash there. That means there should be some evidence of either a fighter or a missile. The only "evidence" there is of this is a single, blurry frame of video that could really be anything. Since you're committed to the "fighter and missile" scenario, though, it MUST be a fighter. The problem now is that you have to discount all of the eyewitnesses, the fact that no F-16 parts were found, and the glaring fact that AAL77 is still gone.

Had you gathered evidence and THEN made a conclusion, you might not be having this problem.