Reply #305: As much "fun" as it is going back and forth with you on this, [View All]

[spooked911]

the problem is that I feel like you're not even trying to see my points, or you're barely trying.

I don't think I am being so very unclear about knees being made to bend and columns still giving some resistance even when bending. I don't think it's so unclear that the tower tilting on one side does not equal a complete one story drop with little resistance.

Mainstream engineers have all kinds of reasons for supporting the official story, consciously or subconsciously. Plus, the assumption I've seen in their models are clearly inaccurate and help the official collapse story.

You wrote "Where is your "solid evidence" that any of Bazant and Verdure's modeling "depends on a significant number of core and perimeter columns getting heated to 600C for a significant period of time over a significant length of their area"? What they wrote in that one sentence appears to me to be flat-out wrong (or so poorly written that it might as well be flat-out wrong)"

You implied that Bazant and Verdure wrote something flat-out wrong, so I just wanted to confirm that's what you meant.