Reply #41: Answers and questions [View All]

[spooked911]

what is the "lot of evidence" that the four 9/11 flight weren't involved in the hijacking military exercise? I don't know of any evidence to this effect.

The special hijack procedure was established by the flight attendant and the pilot on the flight. The cockpit door would remain locked and the pilopt would only open it for the special knock. If there was a hijacking, the flight attendant would call the pilot and alert him to a hijacking with a special password.

The struggle in the cockpit apparently occured at 9:28 am as that is when it was heard over the radio.

"Long-range flights from the northeast were all suspect because of the known flight profiles of the other hijacked aircraft."

REALLY! I never heard that before. Why did they only suspect long-range flights from the northeast? How did they know there wouldn't be other hijacking from other locations????? This is quite interesting information!

"You still haven't answered how UAL93 managed to board civilian passengers at the terminal, depart, fly its route, suddenly deviate from its clearance, descend and crash without being hijacked."

I think that some of the people on the plane were not ordinary civilians but were special agents participating in a hijack drill (there were probably ordinary civilians on the plane as well who may or may not have been forewarned). The hijackers were part of this drill as well. Thus the plane took off like normal, then went through a mock hijacking. That is why it descended, changed course, etc.

The crash scene is what doesn't make sense. It is not an ordinary crash, and why would an ordinary flight crash in this unusual way?