Reply #28: counting [View All]

[medienanalyse]

I said already: shal I give an account of any single cramp?

Now you begin to count. here: concerning the Pentagon.

Quote:"Thus it would be possible for an aircraft part that breached the facade to travel through this area on the ground floor, miss the columns"

"would be possible " ... Yes. I did not count the columns and not the cramps. I admit that I did not take into acount the open area on grond level. I just saw some holes in outside walls in different rings at regions which are obviously not combined ba a common grond level. Any office has normally the struchture of having a bootom, a ceiling and some walls. Hell: by luck the plane went into curves missing nearly all inside walls. I am not going to argue that. You do it, go on, be happy.

About the columns: there is a quote accurate account of steel columns which were NOT missed. Widely published, even on my site.

About my car: it is made of steel and plastic and whatever. What do you want to know? I said: see a car accident. Steel bends and crumbles and breaks and gets shifted. Smaller parts are more affected, heeavier parts less. That is all. Completely irrelevant what is the "partner" in a crash. Completely irrelevant that you obviously try toi turn my argument into a comparison between car and plane (which uses different material)

I said: steel bends and breaks and gets shifted, and it is a every day experience. And that you do not need melting temperatures. That is all.
And the E,D and C-Ring of the wedge had to be reconstructed. That is obvious too.

SO DO NOT COME WITH SUCH IDIOTISMS THAT A CRASH of a plane has no effect and that you need additional explosions to shift, break or bend the steel cramps of the platforms. That is all. That is the only point of conspiracy nuts.

"would be possible "
"would be possible " Ha Ha hHAHAHA.