You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WhereWe Went Wrong [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 10:59 AM
Original message
WhereWe Went Wrong
Advertisements [?]
I came across a good article in Washington Monthly... They assembled a panel of political analysts to do a postmortem on election 2004...If you think the election was stolen there's nothing I or anyone else can do to disabuse you of that notion but if you think there are things we can do better in 2006 and beyond I suggest you read it...


I find James Pinkerton's comments particularly interesting... Some times your enemies are the only ones who will tell you the unvarnished truth... It's like asking your husband or wife if he or she likes your new hairstyle...


"The Democrats had won seven of the nine presidential elections from 1932 to 1964 because in the view of the voter they had a better model—the New Deal, unions, redistribution. But the Republicans came up with a counter model, and it worked well in the eyes of most voters. I think seven of the last 10 presidential elections have been won by the Republicans. That is a strong model, and I think it is stronger than consultants, it is stronger than spin, it is just a basic thing."


I also like Paul Glastris' prescription of how American can build a safety net that confrorms to American values of individual repsonsibility and initiative

"What the Democrats would never say, but I think the smarter ones believe is: We want to move the country somewhat closer to the social safety net you have in Canada and Europe, but to do it in American fashion. Which means being more focused and more market-oriented, but where these extra added programs and benefits don't suppress innovation, don't suppress the urge to take risks, don't suppress the work ethic."


Here's the link to the whole article

http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/features/2004/0412.roundtable.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC