You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Political Lunacy: Bait and Switch [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 02:20 PM
Original message
Political Lunacy: Bait and Switch
Advertisements [?]
http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/weblogs/luna/archives/000980.html

<snip>

The Republican Talk Radio Machine seemed caught off guard by the ferocity of the questioning he received in Kuwait City, especially the ballistic question from Spc. Thomas Wilson, a scout with a Tennessee National Guard unit, over the lack of adequate armor for guardsmen vehicles being deployed north into Iraq.

Limbaugh was mum when the story broke, and most of the rest said scarcely a word in the face of news reports that belayed their continuing assertions from their broadcast bully pulpits that all is well in Iraq but for the slanted reporting of a treacherous American liberal press. Come the next day, however, they had their talking points in line.

(Question – do Limbaugh, and Hannity, et. al, get a fax each morning telling them what to say? An email? Or is it coincidence that they always are in lock step with the message of the day?)

Seems Spc. Wilson had been “coached” on his question by an embedded reporter from Chattanooga. Ipso facto, Limbaugh and crew declare, the question is null and void – the tainted fruit of the tree of the treacherous liberal media, the evil serpent in the garden of conservative paradise. Therefore the question can be disregarded, as can Rumsfeld’s stumbling response. Poor Donny was ambushed, you see, by an unfair question. Set up. A sitting duck, like an armorless Humvee sent down the Baghdad airport road. Blame it on the press.

<snip>

It doesn’t matter if the question concerning lack of adequate armor had been written on a hairball hocked up by a cat at Rumfeld’s feet. What matters is the validity of the claim that such armor protection is lacking and the quality of Rumsfeld’s response.

-MORE-

Interesting to read the responses to this piece. The funny thing is no one's really being fooled, they're just slanting their responses to fit the administration's propaganda (i.e. Limpballs, Hannity, etc.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC