You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #41: The best dissection of the '04 race was Bill Bradley's [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
TayTay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-21-05 09:26 AM
Response to Original message
41. The best dissection of the '04 race was Bill Bradley's
in the NYTimes in April of this year (I think.) The Rethugs have a permanent pyramid structure that includes a very strong organizational base, a strong set of institutional think tanks that produce talkers who can appear on TV and radio and enunciate a consistent set of talking points that come across very strongly as a united front. The Repubs can basically just switch out the top of the pyramid every 4 to 8 years when they select a new candidate for Pres. But they don't re-invent the wheel every 4 years. This saves them time, unites their base quicker and forms a distinct organizational advantage over the Dems.

The Dems have an inverted pyramid structure. They begin to form an organization based on who the nominee is and then expect a fully formed organization to emerge as the nominee assumes the role of Party Standard. This approach does re-invent the wheel every four years and makes the Democratic Party look unorganized, off message and beholden to a dis-united group of interest groups that can sway the nominee and the PArty to whatever the whim of the week is.

The Rethug approach is a superior organizational tool. The Dems are moving to adapt some of this for our Party so that whoever is nominated next time will have a better built-in advantage and won't have to form the entire structure from scratch once the title 'presumptive nominee' is bestowed on him or her.

We will unite, undertake a structure that doesn't outsource the voter registration and GOTV vote to third parties like MoveOn and America Coming Together and come up with a consistent, if loose, set of principles that all Democrats can coalesce around or we will fail again, no matter who the nominee is. We lack the discipline, the structure and the organization to be effective every year, not just the 5-7 months that we are waging Presidential politics. This needs to be fixed. Organization is not a tool from hell; it is not evil. It can, in fact, win elections.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC