You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #69: Hiring & Profits [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
unlawflcombatnt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-05 04:54 PM
Response to Reply #56
69. Hiring & Profits
Exactly.

Hiring workers when there is no current or anticipated demand is a complete waste of money. No companies do that. Claiming that companies hire without some response to demand, simply because they have investment capital, is ridiculous.

If a company hires workers for production and never sells a product, it means they've misjudged the demand for production. They incorrectly anticipated demand for a product. The fact that no demand exists doesn't mean jobs were created without demand. It means jobs were created by a mistaken anticipation of future demand.

I'd like to give the following example. Let's pretend I'm a doctor who sees 5 patients per day. I have one nurse. That's because I only need one nurse to see those 5 patients. Let's say my new half-wit friend, George Bush, gives me $1 million. Now I have plenty of money to invest and hire more nurses. Do I hire any more nurses? Of course not. I don't need any more nurses to see those 5 patients. I don't need any more equipment. So I save the money (or buy gold with it.)

Let's change the example. Let's say my lunatic ex-friend George Bush takes that $1 million back. He then gives spreads it out and gives it to 5,000 potential patients of mine, who previously could not afford my services. Suddenly I have a lot more patients. Suddenly I need more nurses to take care of those patients. Do I hire more nurses. Absolutely. I need more nurses to see the increased number of patients. But I don't have that $1 million to pay the nurses. It doesn't matter. I hire them anyway, because I can borrow money to pay them, or I can pay them when the patients pay me.

Why did I hire more nurses? Because my demand for their services increased. Why did demand for my services increase? Because more patients could afford my services. What initiated this additional demand? The increased income of my potential patients.

So what created the extra jobs for nurses? Increased demand. The increased consumer (patient) income increased demand for my services. Did availability of investment capital have anything to do with creating those jobs? No. Nothing whatsoever.

Jobs were created exclusively as a result of increased demand for services those jobs provided.

Investment does NOT create jobs. Demand does.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC