You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #213: It was not [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
CTLawGuy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-14-06 07:14 PM
Response to Reply #209
213. It was not
He ran against the duly-nominated Democratic nominee, drawing out voters who would vote against other Dem candidates.

How he can call himself a Democrat, even in part, is beyond my understanding.

He's worse than Ralph Nader.

If he wanted to be an independent, he should have left the party and dropped out of the primary. Instead he used the primary and the general to take two bites at the apple.

The point of the primary is to find ONE nominee that the party is to unite behind. At least thats what the closet cons tell us when a DLCer is nominated to something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC