According to this 10/21/06 Boston Globe article:
edited for link:
http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2006/10/21/kerry_is_pressured_to_share_campaign_wealth/Critics in his own party excoriated Kerry for leaving $16 million in the bank after his 2004 presidential campaign. Though federal spending limits kept him from using it all on his own campaign, he could have given away what the law said he couldn't spend; that year, Democrats lost seats in both the House and the Senate.
Kerry aides said the senator saved the cash to cover leftover presidential campaign bills and to pay for lawyers in case he had to challenge voting irregularities in some states or if his race against President Bush had to be settled in court.
Though he quickly kicked in (Dec 2004) $1 million to the DSCC, gave $500,000 to the DCCC, and $1 million to the Democratic National Committee, Kerry has held on to the bulk of his campaign money as he prepares for a possible second run at the White House in 2008.
Last month, when DSCC officials asked all Democratic senators for last-call financial contributions before Election Day, Senator Edward M. Kennedy of Massachusetts was among three lawmakers who donated $1 million each. Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton of New York signed a check for $2 million.
Kerry, however, kept his checkbook shut. The senator's aides said he has no plans to give again.
Jerry Lundergan, chairman of the Kentucky Democratic Party, said he contacted Kerry's advisers on Thursday, urging them to tell the senator how much the congressional campaigns need his money.
"I have made my wishes known," said Lundergan, whose state features two close House races in which Democrats have a good chance to oust incumbent Republicans. "It's his money to do with what he wants to. But I only hope that he shares some of it with those states, such as Kentucky, which contributed very extensively to his campaign. "
Kerry was shamed into contributing another $500,000 from his warchest making his total contribution $3 million from the money he has squirreled away leftover from and since the 2004 campaign.
No one disputes that he has raised other funding for the 2006 midterms. But to continue to post opinion pieces as PROOF that
heyjohn was wrong is factually incorrect. You may not like it, but what they put forward was truthful. You managed to steer the conversation away from this fact and onto the anonymity of the website, but the truth is the truth.
The truth still matters to some of us.