You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #100: Um, Hillary never beat Rove or Delay. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-12-07 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
100. Um, Hillary never beat Rove or Delay.
Edited on Mon Feb-12-07 10:31 AM by Jennicut
It was only Gingrich who was taken down. Only Gore beat Rove but then had the presidency stolen by Florida and then the Supreme Court. Delay did himself in with his own corruption. He was taken to task by one of his own, a Repub on the ethics committee named Joel Hefley. Also, Bill may have won the presidency but left Congress in shambles. Dems were out of power 12 years thanks to the Clinton's good buddy Terry McAuliffe. I detest the DLC as they are all about serving big large corps first and the people last. As for Chavez, I think he is good for trying to put the people first but some of his tactics are too much for me and associating with Iran's crazy leader is a real no-no. As for being a socialist, I really think many anti-DLC'rs are simply populists who want corruption and answering to the highest bidders (aka campaign contributers) taken out of the election and governing process. Also, the United States as we currently know it suffers from an infection of Plutocracy, where the rich and powerful ruling class has complete control. There is almost no Democracy anymore and no one currently in power wants to change the system as obviously it will put them out of power or alt least limit their power. However, in 2000 I voted for Gore and refused to vote for Nader. As we can see now Gore was a far better alternative to Chimpy and Nader was an ecomanical jerk. Gore was also far more of an outsider in his own party then many people realized then. It was Hillary who had the inside track with the DLC. As far as voting for Hillary if she wins the nomination, I still don't know. I wish there would be a legitimate third party alternative (Not Nader!) but if not then I and others who feel like me will be forced to choose between Corporation-light and Ultra-Corporation parties. It won't be a good feeling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC