Reply #4: Sorry - but leading opposition to Hitler was promoting world peace - and Bush is today's [View All]

[papau]

equivalent.

And if you don't agree (and I can tell if you don't agree because I hear everything) I have a waterboard for you - but don't worry, even the about to be our new attorney general will not say water boarding is torture - so "by definition" we won't be torturing you. By the way who do we attack this next spring - Iran perhaps - last chance and we know those that follow will be wimps. Is there any doubt that Bush let 9/11 happen - either on purpose or by incompetence? Is there any doubt about oil company empire being the controlling theme of the Bush presidency - or that our CIA and our military are assigned the task of facilitating American oil company's obtaining whatever they want as anything else occurring is losing the economic war against the U.S.?

Those Nobel's all had other solid reasons, and opposition to Bush policy did not mean the laureates needed less merit in other areas.

But opposition to Bush, in this era, would seem to be a minimum criteria for the peace award.