Reply #17: sorry [View All]

[CTLawGuy]

thats a stretch of logic.

Any terrorist attack now will reflect really badly on Bush, since he's been "obsessed with terrorism for 3 years." How could anyone let him get a pass after he's spent so much time fighting terrorism, and the result of all this investment is that we are no safer than before?

9/11 he could blame on clinton because he'd only been in office 9 months. Theres no one to blame for a new terrorist attack except himself.




You talked about your belief that Dems should be always defending America. Is there any situation in which you think it is right to vote against a war resolution? Or should Dems always vote for the war, no matter how misguided?