Reply #2: I agree that we can't accept Jim March's comments without extra scrutiny [View All]

[cascadiance]

But doesn't it bother you that San Diego's major newspaper prints an article with a subject line that indicates to the browser that *nothing* went wrong, when someone got arrested in this fashion?

This article falsely characterizing how "smooth" this election was was *not* something that Jim March had any control over. Why did they try to make it sound smooth when it wasn't?

I don't think we still yet have the full version of what happened then.

That troubles me. We're in a day and age where it is hard to find information we can trust. This sort of event and descriptions of it is an illustration of this.