You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #85: I think you have that twisted, the documents were never [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread		 This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-04 06:48 PM
Response to Reply #82
85. I think you have that twisted, the documents were never
proven forgeries, the credibility of the source was in question.

To this day there is not definite proof that those documents were forged. As the secretary for the officer that allegedly created them told the media, she didn't type them, but the contents/sentiments found in the documents were consistent with what she knew about GWB and her bosses opinion of the circumstances.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC