You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #16: I know that checks and balances are in the Constitution but [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
texpatriot2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 08:27 PM
Response to Reply #10
16. I know that checks and balances are in the Constitution but
I also know from experience as of late and common sense that if there aren't actual people, officials from the two parties in reasonable proportion or at least willing to take on their own party if they are in the wrong than we don't have them. It's not working. How are they working, even if they are still in the Constitution without someone there to work them? It seems to me that they are running all three branches and they are corrupt. What do we do in that case?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC