Reply #79: My thread was intended as a reminder to those who have followed it closely [View All]

[lostnfound]

Which most DUers have, at least those who visit the 2004 election results section.

After listening to a couple of hours of witnesses at the Conyers forum, as well as numerous reports on FSRN and other Pacifica news shows, and having followed the many stories of disenfranchisement in the days leading up to the election and days thereafter, it is obvious that voter suppression was a key factor in this election.

My thread was not intended as proof to someone who isn't familiar with these many reports. When I have written to the media on any election-related subject, I have included specific facts and analysis.

For those of us who have spent some time buried in the details of analysis looking for potential ELECTRONIC fraud, it is easy to focus on the machines while overlooking the more traditional signs of a stolen election. My thread was a reminder to 'coworkers' on the election forum, not an introduction intended to convince skeptics.

As a matter of fact, I did hear a couple of reports of precincts which had fewer machines than in 2000.