Reply #40: Okay, let's think about this, since you have said it 1,000 times: [View All]

[smartvoter]

Your premise ignores many aspects of the problems in Ohio that cannot be accounted for in ballot counting, although there is reason to suspect that there are problems here as well. The list of problems in the state is enormous -- if you don't know them, thumb through the threads out here for a couple of hours.

Further, the idea that citizens will count them after the fact and that will be accepted as proof of fraud is absurd. If it doesn't happen with all parties present in a formal, organized and above-board manner it will never be accepted.

Moreover, with all the academic and citizen testimony now documented, how can we possibly NOT investigate in a formal manner? What is more important to our democracy than fair and accurate elections?

Finally, as is your pattern, from what I can discern, you completely ignored the questions raised while spitting out a square message you seem hell-bent on stuffing into a round hole. In fact, by virtue of misdirect to "count them yourself later," you entirely avoided the key question of behavior inconsistent with integrity. You've done nothing to answer the question:

WHAT ARE THEY HIDING?