Reply #7: I know you are capable of getting this right. [View All]

[TruthIsAll]

Does 1 in 79 sextillion bother you?
Why is that?

But just saying 86 of 88 is OK?
Why is that?

Do you agree that 86 of 88 is a clear indicator of SOMETHING?

OTOH, HOW WOULD YOU ATTEMPT TO MODEL THE PROBABILITY OF THIS OCCURENCE?
WHERE WOULD YOU START?
OR WOULD YOU NOT EVEN TRY?

IF NOT, WHY NOT?

MAYBE IT'S BECAUSE YOU DON'T LIKE THE ODDS.
MAYBE IT'S BECAUSE TOO MANY PEOPLE MIGHT THINK THAT THEY SHOW THE MACHINES WERE FIXED - JUST LIKE THE INTELLIGENCE WAS FIXED FOR IRAQ.

MAYBE IT'S BECAUSE YOU MUST NAYSAY EVERY DAMN CHANCE YOU GET.

MASTER OBFUSCATOR.

To you, ALL statistical analysis which confirms the documented evidence is worthless.

To you, any excuse to naysay ANY statistical analysis which confirms the documented evidence is priceless.

To you, Bush must be the winner - because there is nothing wrong with Intelligent Design and Manipulation of the final 613 (of 13660) Exit Poll respondents to match the corrupt recorded vote.

To you, Kerry must be the loser - because a pro-Kerry/ reluctant Bush bias and faulty polling procedures in the first 13047 Exit Poll respondents invalidates the results which show Kerry WON - across ALL demographics.