You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #189: whoops, we forgot the rule against ad hominems [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
OnTheOtherHand Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-24-05 10:39 AM
Response to Reply #171
189. whoops, we forgot the rule against ad hominems
Folks, please be cautioned -- although I suppose this is already obvious:

Several DU regulars have expressed vigorous dissent from some of TIA's arguments (and gotten hammered for it). And Febble and I are a lot less predictable than the "naysayer" epithet implies. The attempt to divide us into 12 versus 2 is misguided.

The scope of TIA's attacks is at least wide-ranging ("they don't know a damn thing about the scientific method" -- #144), so one does not feel singled out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC