Reply #135: You've never protected your source code? [View All]

[Fredda Weinberg]

I find that incredible, although it happens to be my practice.

I haven't said anything fraudulent yet, but find it amusing that you can claim in one post that Access is a "toy" (reply #128) and here boast that you've developed dozens of Access projects yourself. No wonder you don't reveal your true identity!

The presence of code isn't relevant here - an extract would allow a comparison between the ballots cast and the totals, which is the point.

Once again, you're demanding what "should be" ... but the fact remains that a contract exists. So if the point is to uncover fraud, why not accept a supervised data extract and begin a serious examination?