You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #9: Commission sees it as a resignation and doesn't want to revoke it. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
JimDandy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 09:00 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Commission sees it as a resignation and doesn't want to revoke it.
Edited on Fri Apr-07-06 09:26 PM by JimDandy
The Emery County commissioners have said Bruce Funk's verbal resignation to them was an official resignation. Their stance seems to be that once he tendered a resignation, whether written or not, Bruce did not have the option of revoking it, only they did. And, although he has asked to have it revoked, they have refused to do so.

In addition, the county attorney, David Blackwell, refused to provided him representation in his official capacity as county clerk. Funk made that request to the county attorney twice, prior to his last day on the job. As I understand it, Mr. Blackwell has stated in a letter to Funk that he will need to represent the county should Mr. Funk file suit. Bruce has retained a private attorney at this point, and if he has not yet filed suit, is intending to shortly.

The county attorney's office isn't legally precluded from representing both parties in a county government dispute. If both parties are county employees, I can't see why Blackwell's office couldn't provide a separate attorney for each party. From my view point as an outsider, it appears to be more of a case of "I don't want to, even though I should." on the part of the county attorney.

Here is one real 'for instance', in Utah, in which a county attorney's office has provided representation to two different county governmental entities who were opposing each other:

A taxpayer disputes his county assessor's assessed value on his home and appeals that assessment to the county council as allowed to by law, in Utah. After hearing the taxpayer's pleadings, the council agrees with the taxpayer's arguments and reduces the assessed value on the home and thereby reduces the taxes the taxpayer owes on his property for that tax year. The assessor's office disagrees with the reduction in value and files suit at the Utah State Tax Commission. The county attorney's office provides a separate attorney to represent each county government agency at the Tax Commission hearing.

Due to the dynamics between the various parties in Emery County, though, were I Bruce, I would not have wanted representation from the county attorney, in this instance. His financial situation (very small county with a correspondingly small clerk's salary) made it necessary for him to inquire about the possibility, though!

JD
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC