You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #67: Fomenko doesn't show any evidence [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Religion/Theology Donate to DU
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-04 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #64
67. Fomenko doesn't show any evidence
and you ought to make an effort to explain what Fomenko is saying. I would summarise it as "most of accepted history was made up; my proof for this is a few pretty pictures that don't have any nubmers to back them up. I claim that all the documents found are forgeries, based on my pretty pictures."

Go on, give us a bit of Fomenko's "new chronology", and his evidence for it. Tell us a date he accepts, and which agrees with the accepted history; then give us an earlier event, and why his evidence for it is more reliable than the accepted history.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Religion/Theology Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC