Reply #99: His existance is not debated by those that believe [View All]

[Az]

Amongst scholars and nonbelievers his existance is considered unproven. The debate lays dormant because there is no new evidence to consider. And the evidence that exists is far from compelling.

Suffice to say that few people's existance have historically lead to death when questioned. Questioning his existance is pretty effectively bread out of a people if you kill off those that do. Even today any suggestion that he did not exist is met with howls of protest. It is true that debates concerning this issue are not well publisized but they do exist.